Nga Hermes Kafexhiu<\/p>\n
N\u00eb nj\u00eb vend ku p\u00ebrplasja mes drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb penale dhe vullnetit elektoral po b\u00ebhet gjithnj\u00eb e m\u00eb e mpreht\u00eb, vendimi i zbardhur i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese vjen si nj\u00eb sinjal q\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb kalohet pa v\u00ebmendje. Ai nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb thjesht nj\u00eb akt juridik teknik, por nj\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrje q\u00eb prek drejtp\u00ebrdrejt ekuilibrin e brisht\u00eb mes shtetit ligjor dhe demokracis\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuese.<\/p>\n
Gjykata Kushtetuese, n\u00eb thelb t\u00eb arsyetimit t\u00eb saj, ka v\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebrball\u00eb dy bot\u00eb, at\u00eb t\u00eb masave t\u00eb ashpra t\u00eb sigurimit penal dhe at\u00eb t\u00eb mandatit t\u00eb dal\u00eb nga vota e qytetar\u00ebve.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kontekst, vendimi i Kolegjit Penal t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00ebn nj\u00eb kritik\u00eb t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb, munges\u00ebn e analiz\u00ebs s\u00eb proporcionalitetit. Sipas Kushtetueses, gjykatat nuk kan\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje t\u00eb mjaftueshme ndaj pretendimit se izolimi i nj\u00eb t\u00eb zgjedhuri prodhon efekt t\u00eb ngjash\u00ebm me nj\u00eb \u201cshkarkim de facto\u201d, duke paralizuar nj\u00eb institucion vendor pa nj\u00eb vendim p\u00ebrfundimtar faj\u00ebsie.<\/p>\n
Nga ana tjet\u00ebr, q\u00ebndrimi i SPAK-ut, i mb\u00ebshtetur n\u00eb nevoj\u00ebn p\u00ebr ruajtjen e integritetit t\u00eb hetimit dhe shmangien e ndikimit mbi provat, p\u00ebrballet me nj\u00eb kund\u00ebrpesh\u00eb t\u00eb fort\u00eb kushtetuese, t\u00eb drejtat politike t\u00eb qytetar\u00ebve dhe parimi i p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsimit nuk mund t\u00eb trajtohen si dyt\u00ebsore p\u00ebrball\u00eb masave t\u00eb siguris\u00eb, sidomos kur nuk provohet pamund\u00ebsia e alternativave m\u00eb t\u00eb buta.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb mendimin paralel, kat\u00ebr gjyqtar\u00eb kan\u00eb shkuar edhe m\u00eb tej n\u00eb arsyetim, duke e konsideruar vet\u00eb mas\u00ebn e arrestit n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast si joproporcionale. Ata ngren\u00eb nj\u00eb pik\u00ebpyetje thelb\u00ebsore, se deri ku mund t\u00eb shkoj\u00eb kufizimi i liris\u00eb personale kur ai fillon t\u00eb deformoj\u00eb vet\u00eb funksionimin e nj\u00eb mandati t\u00eb fituar me vot\u00eb? N\u00ebse nuk provohet se masa t\u00eb tjera m\u00eb t\u00eb lehta nuk garantojn\u00eb hetimin, at\u00ebher\u00eb, sipas k\u00ebtij arsyetimi, burgimi rrezikon t\u00eb humbas\u00eb karakterin e tij si mjet i fundit.<\/p>\n
Nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr element q\u00eb del n\u00eb pah n\u00eb vendim \u00ebsht\u00eb edhe m\u00ebnyra e trajtimit t\u00eb t\u00eb pandehurit gjat\u00eb procesit gjyq\u00ebsor, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb mbajtjen e tij n\u00eb kushte t\u00eb ve\u00e7anta sigurie. Kushtetuesja v\u00ebren munges\u00eb arsyetimi t\u00eb mjaftuesh\u00ebm mbi domosdoshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e k\u00ebsaj mase, duke ngritur \u00e7\u00ebshtje q\u00eb lidhen me dinjitetin njer\u00ebzor dhe prezumimin e pafaj\u00ebsis\u00eb. N\u00eb munges\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00eb rreziku t\u00eb provuar konkret, \u00e7do kufizim shtes\u00eb shfaqet si i v\u00ebshtir\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u2019u justifikuar n\u00eb standardet kushtetuese.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb fund, kthimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes p\u00ebr rishqyrtim n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Lart\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb thjesht nj\u00eb hap procedural. Ai sh\u00ebnon nj\u00eb detyrim p\u00ebr rivler\u00ebsim t\u00eb standardeve me t\u00eb cilat maten masat e siguris\u00eb kur ato prekin funksionar\u00eb t\u00eb zgjedhur. Po ky debat pwrtej tw qenit juridik wshtw dhe politik.<\/p>\n
Pik\u00ebrisht k\u00ebtu q\u00ebndron thelbi i k\u00ebtij episodi juridik, jo n\u00eb emra apo n\u00eb dosje konkrete, por n\u00eb tensionin institucional mes dy parimeve q\u00eb shpesh ecin n\u00eb drejtime t\u00eb kund\u00ebrta. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, mesazhi q\u00eb del \u00ebsht\u00eb i qart\u00eb, prangat e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb penale, sado t\u00eb forta, nuk mund t\u00eb injorojn\u00eb pesh\u00ebn e nj\u00eb mandati t\u00eb zgjedhur me vot\u00eb.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Nga Hermes Kafexhiu N\u00eb nj\u00eb vend ku p\u00ebrplasja mes drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb penale dhe vullnetit elektoral po b\u00ebhet gjithnj\u00eb e m\u00eb e mpreht\u00eb, vendimi i zbardhur i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese vjen si nj\u00eb sinjal q\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb kalohet pa v\u00ebmendje. Ai nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb thjesht nj\u00eb akt juridik teknik, por nj\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrje q\u00eb prek drejtp\u00ebrdrejt ekuilibrin e brisht\u00eb […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-93176","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zennihost.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93176","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zennihost.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zennihost.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zennihost.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93176"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/zennihost.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93176\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zennihost.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93176"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zennihost.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93176"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zennihost.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93176"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}