Nd\u00ebrsa Gjykata Kushtetuese pritet t\u00eb jap\u00eb sot interpretimin e saj, pas k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb kryeministrit n\u00ebse gjykata speciale kund\u00ebr krimit t\u00eb organizuar dhe korrupsionit ka nd\u00ebrhyr\u00eb n\u00eb kompetencat e tij ekzekutive duke pezulluar zonj\u00ebn Balluku, Edi Rama nuk ka rreshtur nga tentativat p\u00ebr ta ndikuar Kushtetuesen. i kapur n\u00eb flagranc\u00eb n\u00eb manipulimin e t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn dy tenderave nga z\u00ebvend\u00ebsja e tij, kryeministri po tenton me \u00e7do kusht t\u00eb ngrej\u00eb nj\u00eb gardh mbrojt\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb mos lejuar t\u00eb preket thelbi i sistemit q\u00eb mban n\u00eb k\u00ebmb\u00eb organizat\u00ebn e tij: vjedhim Shqip\u00ebrin\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb vjedhur vota, vjedhim vota p\u00ebr t\u00eb vjedhur Shqip\u00ebrin\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Nes\u00ebr vendimi\/ BIRN: Rama shton presionin publik ndaj Kushtetueses p\u00ebr “Ballukun”<\/a><\/p>\n I gjendur p\u00ebr her\u00eb t\u00eb par\u00eb p\u00ebrball\u00eb nj\u00eb hetimi mbi aferat e tij qeveritare dhe jo mbi pasurit\u00eb individuale t\u00eb ministrave, Edi Rama ka nisur nj\u00eb fushat\u00eb propagande dhe manipulimi, duke p\u00ebrdorur argumentin banal t\u00eb prezumimit t\u00eb pafaj\u00ebsis\u00eb. N\u00eb thelb, ai k\u00ebrkon q\u00eb an\u00ebtar\u00ebt e organizat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rilindjes as mos arrestohen e as mos pezullohen p\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb nuk ka nj\u00eb vendim t\u00eb form\u00ebs s\u00eb prer\u00eb p\u00ebr faj\u00ebsin\u00eb e tyre. Dometh\u00ebn\u00eb ata t\u00eb vazhdojn\u00eb t\u00eb jen\u00eb ministra, z\u00ebvend\u00ebskryeministra, kryetar\u00eb bashkish\u00eb e t\u00eb punojn\u00eb p\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb i duhen Edi Ram\u00ebs, pavar\u00ebsisht se proceset gjyq\u00ebsore mund t\u00eb zgjasin me vite dhe krimet p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilat akuzohen p\u00ebrs\u00ebriten dhe ndikojn\u00eb n\u00eb proces dhe n\u00eb politik\u00eb.<\/p>\n P\u00ebr t\u00eb mbrojtur k\u00ebt\u00eb argument t\u00eb pad\u00ebgjuar m\u00eb par\u00eb dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb ushtruar presion mbi drejt\u00ebsin\u00eb, kryeministri g\u00ebnjeu publikisht duke i mveshur Komisionit t\u00eb Venecias di\u00e7ka q\u00eb nuk e kishte th\u00ebn\u00eb dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb arritur kulmin me deklarat\u00ebn se raste pezullimi ministrash nga drejt\u00ebsia kur jan\u00eb n\u00eb detyr\u00eb, nuk ka n\u00eb asnj\u00eb vend europian.<\/p>\n Pezullimi i Ballukut\/ Rama i p\u00ebrgjigjet Berish\u00ebs duke th\u00ebn\u00eb se e lufton p\u00ebr parim<\/a><\/p>\n Nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebr Venecian verifikimi ishte shum\u00eb i leht\u00eb, p\u00ebr t\u00eb rr\u00ebzuar mapinulimin tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb kryeminisrit mjafton shembulli francez. Jo vet\u00ebm legjislacioni por dhe rasti i pezullimit t\u00eb funksioneve t\u00eb nj\u00eb ministri, madje t\u00eb vet\u00eb ministrit t\u00eb Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb, mjafton p\u00ebr t\u00eb kuptuar se mbrojtja e interesit publik nga abuzimet e pushtetit ekzekutiv, \u00ebsht\u00eb detyr\u00eb dhe jo nd\u00ebrhyrje e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb.<\/p>\n Franca ndryshe nga Gjermania dhe Mbret\u00ebria e Bashkuar, ku ministrat hetohen nga prokurorit\u00eb e zakonshme dhe largimi i tyre nga detyra \u00ebsht\u00eb ekskluzivisht vendimmarrje politike, ka nj\u00eb mekaniz\u00ebm gjyq\u00ebsor t\u00eb posa\u00e7\u00ebm (Gjykat\u00eb speciale)- Cour de Justice de la R\u00e9publique (CJR). q\u00eb gjykon an\u00ebtar\u00ebt e qeveris\u00eb.<\/p>\n Kjo gjykat\u00eb speciale, e krijuar n\u00eb vitin 1993, ka jurisdiksion vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr veprat penale t\u00eb kryera nga ministrat \u201cn\u00eb ushtrim t\u00eb funksionit t\u00eb tyre\u201d<\/strong>. Ky mekaniz\u00ebm gjyq\u00ebsor i posa\u00e7\u00ebm lidhet me parimin francez t\u00eb \u201cresponsabilit\u00e9 p\u00e9nale des membres du gouvernement\u201d (p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsia penale e an\u00ebtar\u00ebve t\u00eb qeveris\u00eb).<\/p>\n Procedimi penal ndaj nj\u00eb ministri fillon jo nga prokurorit\u00eb e zakonshme, por nga nj\u00eb prokuror i rangut m\u00eb t\u00eb lart\u00eb (Procureur G\u00e9n\u00e9ral pr\u00e8s la Cour de Cassation), i cili vepron si prokuror i specializuar pran\u00eb CJR.<\/p>\n Ky prokuror mund t\u00eb nis\u00eb procedimin:<\/p>\n me iniciativ\u00eb t\u00eb vet\u00eb, \u00c7do k\u00ebrkes\u00eb ose procedim i nisur ndaj nj\u00eb ministri kalon fillimisht p\u00ebr shqyrtim tek Komisioni i Ankesave (Commission des requ\u00eates), i cili vler\u00ebson:<\/p>\n n\u00ebse ka elemente t\u00eb mjaftueshme t\u00eb dyshimit penal, N\u00ebse komisioni konkludon se procedimi \u00ebsht\u00eb i bazuar, \u00e7\u00ebshtja i kalon faz\u00ebs s\u00eb hetimit gjyq\u00ebsor. N\u00ebse jo, procedimi pushon n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb faz\u00eb. N\u00ebse \u00e7\u00ebshtja pranohet, ajo i kalon Komisionit t\u00eb Hetimit (Commission d\u2019instruction), nj\u00eb trup\u00eb e pavarur e p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb nga gjyqtar\u00eb i cili ka si kompetenca t\u00eb plota hetimore:<\/p>\n marrjen e deklarimeve, Pik\u00ebrisht n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb faz\u00eb shfaqet mund\u00ebsia p\u00ebr pezullimin e ministrit nga detyra. Komisioni ka autoritet t\u00eb nd\u00ebrmarr\u00eb masa, t\u00eb cilat, ndryshe nga vendimet politike t\u00eb qeveris\u00eb, jan\u00eb mas\u00eb gjyq\u00ebsore dhe mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrfshijn\u00eb:<\/p>\n a) Masa sigurie penale<\/strong>. Si p.sh. kontrolli gjyq\u00ebsor, ndalimi i kontaktit me d\u00ebshmitar\u00eb, kufizimi i l\u00ebvizjes etj. sigurimin e hetimit, N\u00eb praktik\u00eb, edhe pse pezullimi nuk ndodh shpesh, ai \u00ebsht\u00eb juridikisht i mundur dhe i parashikuar n\u00eb kompetencat e CJR, pasi pezullimi i Minstrit ka natyr\u00eb gjyq\u00ebsore, jo politike.<\/p>\n \u00cbsht\u00eb thelb\u00ebsore t\u00eb theksohet se:<\/p>\n pezullimi i ministrit n\u00eb Franc\u00eb nuk varet nga Kryeministri, Presidenti apo shumica parlamentare, Ky mekaniz\u00ebm \u00ebsht\u00eb krijuar p\u00ebr t\u00eb shmangur konfliktin interesit mes ekzekutivit dhe sistemit t\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb, duke garantuar:<\/p>\n pavar\u00ebsi t\u00eb hetimeve, Rasti m\u00eb ilustrues i k\u00ebsaj praktike, \u00ebsht\u00eb ai i ministrit francez t\u00eb Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb (2021- 2023), \u00c9ric Dupond- Moretti.<\/strong><\/p>\n Ministri akuzohej m\u00eb 6 korrik 2020 se ka p\u00ebrdorur pozit\u00ebn e tij p\u00ebr t\u00eb marr\u00eb sanksione t\u00eb pabazuara ndaj magjistrat\u00ebve q\u00eb po hetonin klient\u00ebt dhe miqt\u00eb e tij. Ishte hera e par\u00eb q\u00eb nj\u00eb minister n\u00eb detyr\u00eb gjykohet nga juridiksion special (CJR), p\u00ebr krime dhe kund\u00ebrvajtje t\u00eb kryera gjat\u00eb ushtrimit t\u00eb detyr\u00ebs.<\/p>\n Ky \u00ebsht\u00eb rasti m\u00eb modern ku nj\u00eb minist\u00ebr \u201cn\u00eb detyr\u00eb\u201d d\u00ebrgohet zyrtarisht n\u00eb gjyq nga gjykata speciale (CJR), nd\u00ebrsa vazhdonte t\u00eb ishte minist\u00ebr. \u00c7far\u00eb ndodhi?<\/p>\n CJR e vuri n\u00ebn hetim, \u00c9ric Dupond-Moretti nuk u shkarkua p\u00ebr arsye politike, por disa funksione iu kufizuan nga gjykata. Ai u shpall i pafajsh\u00ebm n\u00eb vitin 2023. Ky \u00ebsht\u00eb shembulli m\u00eb i qart\u00eb modern i nd\u00ebrhyrjes direkte t\u00eb gjykates spesiale (CJR) n\u00eb ushtrimin e funksionit t\u00eb nj\u00eb ministri.<\/p>\n Dhe nj\u00ebkoh\u00ebsisht shembulli m\u00eb i qart\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb kuptuar se n\u00eb rastin e zonj\u00ebs Balluku nuk ka asnj\u00eb uzurpim kompetencash t\u00eb ekzektuvit nga gjyq\u00ebsori, aq m\u00eb pak kompetencat e Edi Ram\u00ebs, q\u00eb ka v\u00ebn\u00eb \u00e7do pushtet n\u00ebn thundr\u00ebn e tij. Rama nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i shqet\u00ebsuar p\u00ebr ndarjen e pushteteve, por p\u00ebr ndaljen eventuale t\u00eb vjedhjes q\u00eb e mban n\u00eb pushtet. \u00a9lapsi.al<\/strong><\/p>\n The post Dosja Balluku\/ Manipulimet e Ram\u00ebs dhe shembulli francez<\/a> appeared first on Lapsi.al<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Nd\u00ebrsa Gjykata Kushtetuese pritet t\u00eb jap\u00eb sot interpretimin e saj, pas k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb kryeministrit n\u00ebse gjykata speciale kund\u00ebr krimit t\u00eb organizuar dhe korrupsionit ka nd\u00ebrhyr\u00eb n\u00eb kompetencat e tij ekzekutive duke pezulluar zonj\u00ebn Balluku, Edi Rama nuk ka rreshtur nga tentativat p\u00ebr ta ndikuar Kushtetuesen. i kapur n\u00eb flagranc\u00eb n\u00eb manipulimin e t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn dy […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55556","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zennihost.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55556","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zennihost.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zennihost.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zennihost.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55556"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/zennihost.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55556\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zennihost.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zennihost.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55556"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zennihost.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\npas nj\u00eb kall\u00ebzimi penal,
\nose pas k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb 20 qytetar\u00ebve t\u00eb thjesht\u00eb, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt kan\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u2019i drejtohen CJR-s\u00eb (nj\u00eb ve\u00e7ori unike n\u00eb sistemet juridike per\u00ebndimore).<\/p>\n
\nn\u00ebse vepra \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer n\u00eb ushtrim t\u00eb funksionit,
\ndhe n\u00ebse \u00e7\u00ebshtja i p\u00ebrket juridiksionit t\u00eb CJR.<\/p>\n
\nanaliz\u00ebn e provave,
\nvendosjen e masave t\u00eb sigurimit penal,
\np\u00ebrfshir\u00eb kufizime t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejta ndaj ushtrimit t\u00eb funksionit.<\/p>\n
\nb) Kufizimi i funksioneve publike. N\u00ebse ekziston rrezik i ndikimit t\u00eb ministrit n\u00eb hetim, komisioni mund t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb kufizimin e drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb t\u00eb kompetencave, duke e b\u00ebr\u00eb t\u00eb pamundur vazhdimin normal t\u00eb ushtrimit t\u00eb detyr\u00ebs.
\nc) Pezullim i p\u00ebrkohsh\u00ebm nga detyra<\/strong>. N\u00eb rastet kur veprat penale jan\u00eb serioze (p.sh. korrupsion aktiv, korrupsion pasiv, shp\u00ebrdorim detyre, abuzim me fonde publike), Komisioni i Hetimit mund t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb pezullim t\u00eb menj\u00ebhersh\u00ebm t\u00eb ministrit<\/strong>. Ky pezullim (c) nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb akt politik, por mas\u00eb gjyq\u00ebsore e motivuar<\/strong>, e cila synon:<\/p>\n
\nruajtjen e integritetit t\u00eb procesit,
\nparandalimin e ndikimit institucional.<\/p>\n
\nnuk \u00ebsht\u00eb pasoj\u00eb e presionit politik, por
\n\u00ebsht\u00eb rezultat i nj\u00eb procedimi gjyq\u00ebsor t\u00eb specializuar<\/strong>, t\u00eb bazuar n\u00eb prova dhe analiza t\u00eb pavarura.<\/p>\n
\nmbrojtje t\u00eb parimit t\u00eb barazis\u00eb para ligjit, dhe nj\u00ebkoh\u00ebsisht,
\nrespektimin e rolit politik t\u00eb ministrit (nuk ka shkarkim automatik, por pezullim i lidhur me hetimin).<\/p>\n
\nmasa e siguris\u00eb p\u00ebrfshiu kufizime n\u00eb ushtrim t\u00eb disa kompetencave si minist\u00ebr i Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb,<\/strong>
\nq\u00eb n\u00eb praktik\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebn pezullim t\u00eb pjessh\u00ebm<\/strong> gjyq\u00ebsor.<\/strong><\/p>\n